Throughout this entire work, I have attempted to confer not simply the considerate, but essentially obligatory award to a few sources that highly influenced my work.
Whilst the entire concern has been engaged to acquire the acquiescence of those credited below, I apologise for those that I could not, via my neophyte manner, acquire contact
Without a shadow of doubt the significant impetus concerning my research being:
Worlds in Collision author: Immanuel Velikovsky, Abacus edition published in 1972 by Sphere Books Ltd. First published in
The veritable cornucopia with regard to ancient metrology, symbolic numbers, furthermore ancient cosmology wisdom and science of the ancient and traditional societies, furthermore an enormous influence on my work, likewise an utter necessity to those who desire to study these fields of research being:
The Dimensions of Paradise, author: John Michell, published 1988 by
As regards Plato, in the midst of numerous my favoured source with reference being Plato: Translated by Benjamin Jowett, reprinted by arrangement with Oxford University Press
An additional vital source of reference being: The Universal History of Numbers, author: Georges Ifrah, The Harvil Press London, translated from the French by: David Bellos, .F. Harding, Sophie Wood and Ian Monk
Another necessity with regard to mathematics being: The Man Who Loved Only Numbers, first published in the
As to the Great Pyramid of Giza, an indispensable read, so I believe, being:
Secrets of the Great Pyramid: author Peter Tompkins, with an appendix by Livio Catullo Stecchini, published in Penguin Books 1973
A favoured book of mine being The Sirius Mystery author Robert Temple, published by Arrow in 1999, this first edition published in the
Likewise, the essential: Pyramids and Temples of Gizeh: W. M .Flinders Petrie 1883.
To those I may possibly have inadvertently overlooked, I can but proffer my inmost apology.
Likewise as mentioned within the introduction page of this web site, I cannot neglect the tremendous amount of time and effort that my immediate family, along with close friends exhausted via rummaging through my mature papers, attempting to situate the same in a sense of order prepared
In view of the fact that all enthusiastically assisted reassigning my laboriously gleaned hand-written data, from paper to PC, for this reason I express gratitude to them all.
I shall not cause any preventable discomfiture via placing their names within a web site, as this would be an intrusion into their confidentiality. They discern who they are; therefore, I express my earnest appreciation pertaining to the painstaking labours undergone by all.
Nonetheless, despite my straightforward requirement to express my cordial appreciation to the above authors-researchers etc, it may be observed within this work the manner via which all the numbers interweave with the dimensions I consider to be intended with regard to the Great Pyramid. It likewise is, via my usual awry modus operandi, a source {the Great Pyramid} via which I obtained numerous numbers.
{The Great Pyramid of Giza henceforth denoted as GP}
For example, I examined Phi, {the Golden Ratio or whatever terminology is deemed correct}
Phi is formed the straightforward approach thus: the square root of 5 + 1 ÷ 2
Whilst I experimented, not via the customary methods of division, but via multiplication, I unearthed the following, mayhap asinine observations
Phi being: 1.618033988749… observe that which the multiplication process procures utilising Phi as exactly: 1.61833988749 {obviously minus the 0}
{A} 1 x 6 x 1 x 8 x 3 = 144, a fine commencement, continue: 144 x 3 x 9 x 8 x 8 = 248832, at this time it will most undoubtedly not require the proverbial rocket scientist to perceive a reasonable Earth mean circumference of 24883.2 albeit tenfold
Certainly, it corresponds to that of John Michell, nonetheless I have not, to date, observed 24883.2 procured via my technique
Continue in the identical vein: 248832 x 7 x 4 x 9 = 62705664, at this moment apart from 62705664 being 252 x 248832, a recognised ancient ratio of measure: 175:176 enters the field in view of the fact that the 62705664 ÷ 1.75 = 35831808, a tolerable Moon circumference, hence 35831808 is obviously 144 x 248832.
Of course, once more, the 35831808 corresponds to that of John Michell, this, I would assume if not confirmation as to my awry consequences, subsequently it most certainly adds credence to my individual judgment that the gentleman is a mastermind in addition to a visionary, we likewise perceive 252, a highly functional number, consequently on and on the carousel revolves, where she stops?
I likewise performed the self same process with Pi, not for one moment do I herein declare the solution re Pi, I simply employed Pi as exactly: 3.1415926535897
{B} 3 x 1 x 4 x 1 x 5 x 9 x 2 = 1080, which is the lunar, Yin Yang number, likewise 1080 is 7.5 x 144, {continue}: 1080 x 6 x 5 x 3 = 97200 this is 24883.2 x 3.90625, whilst we multiply the 3.90625 by an FP {256:243} component: 256 we obtain 1000
Continue: 97200 x 5 x 8 x 9 x 7 = 244944000 this is 3.90625 x 62705664 {as above in Phi} whilst we continue via multiplying the 3.90625 by the FP {256:243} we obtain 4.11522633745, that multiplied by the “Earth” 24883.2 obtains 102400, this is 100 x 1024 the 9th term of PWS
There arrives a moment whereby both Pi and Phi produce the identical number albeit the Pi number be increased a thousand fold, as such {disregard the zero of Phi}
{C} 1 x 6 x 1 x 8 x 3 x 3 x 9 = 3888
{D} 3 x 1 x 4 x 1 x 5 x 9 x 2 x 6 x 5 x 3 x 5 x 8 = 3888000
Likewise why is it that the commencing digits of Pi create the following “pattern”
3.14159265358979323846, in view of the fact that following the decimal point
The 3rd digit is 1, the 6th digit is 2 in addition to the 9th digit is 3, nevertheless the number 4 is the 19th digit?
Whilst Pi ÷ 19 = 0.16534698176 {obviously abridged}
Thus 123 divided by 0.16534698176 then multiplied by exactly 459.749429977212 = 1.6180339887498948…hence Phi correct to 16 decimal places, all that needs be is to “manipulate” the exact 459.749429977212, or 123, to obtain an enhanced version re Phi
Therefore I may well fabricate my hypothesis, incriminate Pi and Phi as my Ancient abacus of knowledge so to speak, however this would be asinine illusion, nonetheless does it not appear somewhat peculiar. Although I have occupied, I believe, attention to detail to impart the fact that all number is interconnected, tis most decidedly of further import that all number may possibly be manipulated to agree with the authors required product.
Tis the same re symbolic number, for instance 1625 Gematria value: Tree of Life, within this website I have illustrated the approximate Equatorial rotation period of the Sun as 26 days {the Polar approx. 37 days} it follows that 1625 is 117.36111 x 13.846153 {360 ÷ 26}. In addition, that 117.36111 x 19.49538461 = 2288 the GP extant top platform perimeter, furthermore the 19.49538461 ÷ 13.846153 = 1.408
The 1.408 leads to virtually the entire ancient units of measure, alternatively the 19.49538461 x 26 = 506.88, this being one tenth of the Greek mile {1.408 x 360 x 506.88} obviously via this method 2288 is 1.408 x 1625
Likewise Gematria: YHWH being 26 furthermore 26 x 62.5 = 1625, etc
It could furthermore be stated that virtually all number stems via the Platonic Precession cycle of 25920 since 25920 ÷ 1625 = 15.95076923 and this is the Sun 13.846153 x 1.152, which is the longer value of the Egyptian foot, alternatively: 2592 minus 1625 = 967.
Whilst we divide the 5068.8 by this 967 we obtain 5.241778697, which multiplied by 310.009272411616 = 1625
The 310.009272411616 divided by the above 117.36111 obtains 2.641499125874 that multiplied by 87639552 obtains 231499800, which is, amongst numerous choices, 38075.625 times the “Sea” mile of 6080
As may be witnessed, I trust, through study of this web site that all number is interconnected I shall therefore be as brief as feasibility allows
The 38075.625 is 122.820923076 x 310.009272411616
The 122.820923076 is 8.8704 x 13.846153, moreover the 8.8704 is 5.0688 x 1.75
As to the 87639552, simply to increase legroom, this is 1881 x 46592, the 46592 is 2288 {GP top platform} multiplied by 20.3636 this 20.3636 x 148.5 = 3024 the Great Pyramid base perimeter, in addition to the 148.5 multiplied by 174.5454 = 25920 Platonic Precession cycle.
The 174.5454 is 1.71818 x 101.5873015, which is one hundred times 1.015873 which is the Eye of Horus fraction 64 ÷ 63 etc
There being no requirement for the proverbial “contrivance” no necessity to manoeuvre, the numbers are simply at hand. Perchance the reader does not concur with my hypothesis, subsequently I have botched dejectedly my endeavour to convey my hypothesis, furthermore I hope I have, as a minimum, ushered the reader to reconsider the accepted viewpoints fed to not only our generation, furthermore generations preceding, yet of more import our children. There is an unquestionable requirement to regain, not vanished, merely forgotten understanding to aid humanity to comprehend the wisdom bequeathed to modern day humanity, thereby permitting the imposing gnosis of the Ancients to be perceived in all its merited splendour
Following are generally accepted ancient units of measure, as they relate to the GP {Great Pyramid} base side length of 756 {modern day feet}
To obtain the amount of the self same units comprising the intended height of 480 modern day feet is fairly straightforward. In view of the fact that 756 is 1.575 x 480 therefore we observe that 756 ÷ 660 = 1.14545 the Egyptian foot
The GP “lost” Pyramidion, I calculates as a base side length of 9.85359375, which is obtained via dividing exactly 10.01 by the {most apt} Eye of Horus fraction: 64:63
Via a base length of 9.85359375, the height being 6.25625, which is 9.85359375 ÷ 1.575, hence we currently perceive the “finished” GP in miniature, in view of the fact that the GP base side length of 756 ÷ 1.575 = 480, the intended “finished” height
Therefore the 660 ÷ 1.375 = 480, in view of the fact that the: 1.575 is 1.14545 x 1.375
As to the petite divisors, such as within {3} 1.32 subsequently 1.32 ÷ 1.375 = 0.96
In addition, this 0.96 multiplied by 500 = 480
Likewise the even smaller divisor in {4} 1.1, subsequently 1.1 ÷ 1.375 = 0.8 and this multiplied by 600 = 480, so on and so forth, it really is that straightforward
Perchance this methodology appears suspect subsequently an uncomplicated explanation being as such utilising only three examples extracted via the initial titled section
Egyptian believed units of measure
{1} 756 ÷ 660 = 1.14545 the Egyptian Foot
{2} 756 ÷ 440 = 1.71818 the Egyptian Cubit
{3} 756 ÷ 1.32 = 572.7272 the Egyptian Stade {500 ft.}
{4} 756 ÷ 1.1 = 687.2727 the Egyptian Stade {600 ft.}
{5} 756 ÷ 1.05720823 = 715.0909 the Egyptian Furlong
{1} 480 ÷ 756 = 0.634920 this x 1.8040909 = 1.14545 the 1.8040909 x 660 = 1190.7
{3} 480 ÷ 756 = 0.634920 this x 902.04545 = 572.7272 the 902.04545 x 1.32 = 1190.7
{5} 480 ÷ 756 = 0.634920 this x 1126.268181 = 715.0909 the 1126.268181 x 1.05720823 = 1190.7
As to the produced 1190.7 this plus 7950 = 9140.7, the distance pertaining to the GP “sockets” furthermore 7950 is 480 x 16.5625, this multiplied by 19.2 {one tenth the Gematria: Mary 192} obtains 318, the Gematria: Eliezer, likewise Abraham defeating his mortal enemies via the aid of his trustworthy 318 men
The 7950 is the GP base side length: 756 x 10.5158730, in addition to this multiplied by 30.24 = 318
Alternatively the 1190.7 ÷ 192 = 6.2015625, this multiplied by the FP {256:243} then by the Platonic 25920 = 169344 and this divided by the 756:480 ratio of 1.575 obtains 107520 and this is 20.3636 miles of 5280 feet.
The 20.3636 multiplied by the 1190.7 obtains 24246.98181 which is 0.2806363 x 86400 seconds in 24 hours the 0.2806363 x 480 = 134.705454 which is the Egyptian cubit: 1.71818 x 78.4
Moreover 78.4 x 1166400 = 91445760 this is the GP volume
In that case 1166400 being 25 x 46656 the amount of cubic inches in one cubic yard
The 1166400 ought to be familiar to the musically inclined. There are so many options, nonetheless numerous refuse to even remotely mull over an intended height of 480, considering as an alternative that the slant angle be the Holy Grail, which obviously via computing 756 with 480 does not tally with their hypothesised angles. With regard to angles, there are so many bandied about, where is the factual angle, in view of the fact that even William Flinders Petrie mentions at least five candidates that I know of
Anyway, I consider the 280 cubits comprising the GP height that Petrie alludes to as 12 ÷ 7 = 1.714285 this multiplied by 280 = 480 otherwise 1.714285 x 441 = 756
Hence I see naught erroneous with this ostensible cubit of 1.714285
Seeing as Petrie, J. H. Cole etc mention 440 cubits consists the base side length in that case 441 ÷ 440 = 1.0022727, this being the Greek foot and 1.0022727 x 756 = 757.71818, this being 480 x 1.5785795454 which is 1.71818 x 0.91875 and this multiplied by the FP {256:243} obtain 0.9679012345. In addition, this multiplied by 81 regains the above 78.4 otherwise the 757.71818 ÷ 1.714285 = 442.0022727
This 442.0022727 x 480 = 212161.0909 which is 1029 x 206.1818 this being 100 x 2.061818 an ostensible Egyptian Sacred Foot
I will finish at this point, perchance my hypothesis is not proven, and in that case, I have failed to deliver my point of view decisively. Nevertheless bear the number 1029 in mind since within one of my essays this being the number of Menhirs in an area of
1029 Menhirs in 10 lines
1099 Menhirs in 11 lines
594 Menhirs in 13 lines, the 594 pertaining to the Kermario alignment, wherein one of the rows contains 555 Menhirs, one circle contains 39, hence 555 + 39 = 594
Ancient Units of measure
Egyptian units
{1} 756 ÷ 660 = 1.14545 the Egyptian Foot
{2} 756 ÷ 440 = 1.71818 the Egyptian Cubit
{3} 756 ÷ 1.32 = 572.7272 the Egyptian Stade {500 ft.}
{4} 756 ÷ 1.1 = 687.2727 the Egyptian Stade {600 ft.}
{5} 756 ÷ 1.05720823 = 715.0909 the Egyptian Furlong
Roman units
{6} 756 ÷ 12571.428571 = 0.06013636 the Roman Digit
{7} 756 ÷ 785.714285 = 0.9621818 the Roman Foot
{8} 756 ÷ 628.571428 = 1.202727 the Roman Remen
{9} 756 ÷ 523.809523 = 1.4432727 the Roman Cubit
{10} 756 ÷ 1.571428 = 481.0909 the Roman Stade
{11} 756 ÷ 1.3095238 = 577.30909 the Roman Stade {600 ft.}
{12} 756 ÷ 1.2571428 = 601.3636 the Roman Furlong {625 ft.}
Greek units
{13} 756 ÷ 12068.571428 = 0.06264204545 the Greek Digit
{14} 756 ÷ 754.285714 = 1.0022727 the Greek Foot
{15} 756 ÷ 502.857142 = 1.50340909 the Greek Cubit
Common Egyptian units
{16} 756 ÷ 770 = 0.98181 Foot
{17} 756 ÷ 513.333 = 1.47272 Cubit
{18} 756 ÷ 1.54 = 490.9090 Stade {500 ft.}
{19} 756 ÷ 1.28333 = 589.0909 Stade {600 ft.}
{20} 756 ÷ 1.232 = 613.6363 Furlong {625 ft.}
Other believed units
{21} 756 ÷ 550 = 1.374545 Sacred Foot
{22} 756 ÷ 366.666 = 2.061818 Sacred Cubit
Various believed units of measure, Greek, Egyptian, Roman etc
The employed 1.00571428 {Denoted as P} is the ratio 5280:5250
{23} 756 ÷ 656.25 = 1.152 which x P = 1.15858285714
{24} 756 ÷ 437.5 = 1.728, which x P = 1.73787428571
{25} 756 ÷ 1.3125 = 576 which x P = 579.29142857
Other Ancient Units
0.9732096 roman foot longer value
0.96768 roman foot shorter value
691.2 Egyptian Stade
604.8 roman foot
633.6 Greek furlong
608.256 roman furlong
5068.8 Greek mile
5040 Greek mile {version 2}
4866.048 roman mile
4838.4 roman mile {version 2}
2.0736 Isaac Newton cubit
2.085449143 polar radius {John Michell}
20901888 Earth mean radius {J.M.}
2520000
2700000
37800000
3.475748571 sacred rods in 2.085449143
1.728 Egyptian cubit
1.52064 Greek cubit
1.4598144 roman cubit
1.45152 roman cubit shorter value
1.512 Greek cubit shorter value
1.152 Egyptian foot longer value
2304 polar feet, see 2.085449143
2419.2 Hebrew feet see 2.085449143
1.064448 Arabian Hashimi foot
2.742857143 Sumerian cubit
1.008 Greek foot {shorter value}
1.01376 Greek foot {longer value}
Likewise regarding the entire above units, they be merely ratios of each other, in a manner of speaking, the J.M denotes John Michell as a reference, lest it would appear that I rely exclusively upon fellow authors-researchers with regard to my own findings, subsequently the following may assist in this regard
The various techniques I demonstrate herein, to the best of my knowledge, will not be observed in a different place, this be no proverbial, egotistical, pat on the back, tis merely testament to the Ancient’s unquestionable wisdom, likewise the total integration of number
A few example ratios being 25:24 {Greek to Roman} 25:22 {Egyptian to Greek} 175:176 {longer to shorter} such as 175 ÷ 176 = 0.94431818 and this multiplied by 5068.8 = 5040 {please see chart above}
I shall merely illustrate the first unit above:
0.9732096 roman foot longer value, the Comma of Pythagoras being: 531441:524288
The FP, as indicated prior denotes Fraction of Plato {Pythagorean Limma {256:243}
{1} 9732096 ÷ 524288 = 18.5625 this multiplied by the FP = 19.555, that multiplied by 270 = 5280 the mile
9732096 ÷ 531441 = 18.31265, this divided by the FP then multiplied by the square root of 531441 namely 729 = 12672, this is 2.4 x 5280
The Platonic Precession cycle is 25920
{2} 9732096 ÷ 25920 = 375.4666 this multiplied by 14.0625 = 5280
The 14.0625 being 12.5 x 1.125 this is FP x FP x Comma, the 12.5 x 58.32 = 729, the 58.32 is 2.25 x 25.92
The seconds within 24 hours is 86400
{3} 9732096 ÷ 86400 = 112.64 this multiplied by 3.40909 obtains 384 the lead PWS term the 3.40909 {amongst numerous options} multiplied by 213.84 = 729
The 213.84 being 1.8984375 x 112.64 and the 1.8984375 multiplied by the FP component 256 obtains 486 the 3rd PWS term.
Likewise the 3.40909 ÷ 3.2323 {6080 ÷ 1881} obtains 1.0546875 that multiplied by FP = 1.111
The Great Pyramid volume is 91445760
{4} 9732096 ÷ 91445760 = 0.106424 this multiplied by 10.440340909 = 1.111
The 10.440340909 is 3.0625 x 3.40909, which incidentally multiplied by the Grand Gallery floor line length of: 1881 = 6412.5, which is 3377.777 x 1.8984375 {in {3} above} the 3377.777 being 1.111 x 3040, This being half the “Sea” mile of 6080, furthermore the 3.0625 is 2.7222 x 1.125 {2.7222 x 126 = 343 this being 7 x 7 x 7}
There are 46656 cubic inches in one cubic yard
{5} 9732096 ÷ 46656 = 208.592592 this is 3.2323 x 64.5333 and this multiplied by 75 obtains 4840 the amount of square yards in one acre
There are 43560 square feet in one acre
{6} 9732096 ÷ 43560 = 223.41818 this is 1.071074 x 208.592592 and the 1.071074 x 24200 = 25920, the 24200 is 5 x 4840
There are 6080 feet in the
{7} 9732096 ÷ 6080 = 1600.67368 his is 7.16447 times the 223.41818 {in {6} above} and the 7.16447 x 1881 = 13476.375 this multiplied by FP x 360 obtains 5111040, this is 25920 x 197.185185 which is 166.375 x 1.185185 {32:27} which is the musical scale, Pythagorean minor third
Moreover the 166.375 multiplied by the Comma component 524288 obtains 87228416 which is 8.962962 x 9732096 the 8.962962 multiplied by 70.4 {Stonehenge lintel ring pillar association} obtains 630.9925925 which is 166.375 x 3.7925925, and this multiplied by 2733.75 = 10368 the end PWS term in addition to the 2733.75 is 2430 x 1.125, etceteras
I have demonstrated on numerous occasions the division 6080 ÷ 1881 that obtains 3.2323
The 3.2323 ÷ 0.9732096 = 3.321302 {abridged} whilst we multiply this factor by the FP we obtain 3.4989850843864
I have abridged this factor, albeit slightly, in order that the reader will perceive within the digits the Tetractys number 8436 albeit rearranged.
Therefore 8436 ÷ 3.4989850843864 = 2410.98484176, we recognize tother important number of the Tetractys is 666, therefore 2410.98484176 ÷ 666 = 3.62009736
At this time, via my awry logic at least, we observe the 0.9732096 likewise rearranged therefore we are on reliable ground. In view of the fact that 3.62009736 is the longer value of the Greek foot: 1.01376 x 3.5709609375
And 3.5709609375 multiplied by the Comma component 524288 = 1872211.968, at this time {as prior}, there are numerous options, nevertheless I shall, at this time, end as speedy as feasible, in view of the fact that the 1872211.968 ÷ 8436 = 221.931243243, this being the 6080 ÷ 1881 product: 3.2323 x 68.6599783783 that multiplied by the Platonic 25920 x 666 obtains 1185257981.952
The 1185257981.952 is the very commencing roman foot longer value 0.9732096 x 1217885625, this is 46656 x 26103.515625, when we divide the GP volume of 91445760 by this 26103.515625 we obtain 3503.1970909, this amongst numerous, is 3.2323 x 1083.8016
The 1083.8016 being 0.9732096 x 1113.6363, this being 1.9444 Egyptian Stades {500ft.} of 572.7272, the 1.9444 x 90 = 175 this it will be discerned is a component of the ancient unit ratio 175:176
In hindsight the straightforward closing option being to illustrate the above 1083.8016 as 1075.2 x 1.008, which is the shorter value of the Greek foot, furthermore that the 1075.2 is but 0.203636 modern day miles of 5280 feet, moreover the 0.203636 x 14850 = 3024 the GP base perimeter
The 14850 being 3.068181 x 4840, the amount of square yards within one acre, then the 3.068181 x 28160 = 86400, seconds in 24 hours
Perchance the reader, regardless of my herein efforts, be unconvinced as to my “discovery” of units, subsequently I apologise in respect of my inept endeavour to illustrate that there be more than one method to acquire 0.9732096, otherwise whichever Ancient-Modern units of measure, anyway, we move progress
Numbers within this website essays
{1} 479001600 {=12!}
This 12! basically means: 1 x 2 x 3 x 4 x 5 x 6 x 7 x 8 x 9 x 10 x 11 x 12 = 479001600
The 479001600 being, for example: 12 x 39916800 = 479001600.
The 39916800 being 3326400 x 12 and 3326400 is 277200 x 12.
The 277200 is 23100 x 12 the 23100 is 1925 x 12 the 1925 is Gematria value Simon Peter
{2} 4561920000, the area of the Plato Atlantis {minus the central shrine} however 4561920000 is 176000 x 25920, and more besides
{3} 274337280 is the GP as a cube I.E: 756 x 756 x 480 = 274337280
{4} 91445760 is the actual volume of the GP {274337280 ÷ 3 = 91445760}
{5} 131485464 is an Earth Equatorial circumference of 24902.55 x 5280, whereas John Michell mentions a mean Earth circumference of 131383296
{6} 11404800 is the Moons diameter in feet I.E.: 5280 x 2160
{7} 35831808 is the Moons circumference in feet I.E.: 2160 x 5280 x 3.141818 this being a much used and abused approximation of Pi which is merely the GP base perimeter of 3024 ÷ 962.5, whilst we divide the mile of 5280 by this 962.5 we obtain 5.4857142 and this multiplied by 70 = 384 the lead PWS term
{8} 20901888 being the Earths mean radius, given that 20901888 x 2 x 3.142857 = 131383296 {24883.2 x 5280} the 3.142857 being the Schooldays Pi of 22 ÷ 7.
Likewise 3.142857 is 3024 ÷ 962.1818, which as ought to appear obvious when divided by 306.25 regains the above Pi of 3.141818, since 306.25 x 3.142857 = 962.5
Likewise, my Earth figure of 131485464 produces a radius of 20918142 {131485464 ÷ 2 ÷ 3.142857}
Incidentally my 20918142 minus 16254 = 20901888, furthermore 16254 being Founder of the City: 1225 x 13.26857142, this happens to be the Schooldays Pi: 3.142857 x 4.221818, that multiplied by the modern day furlong: 660 = 2786.4, and this minus 2288 = 498.4 which minus 302.4 = 196, that multiplied by 466560 = 91445760 the G} volume hence all are totally interconnected
{9} 432432 this is the GP base side length of 756 {feet} multiplied by 572 {inches} 572, being the GP extant top platform side length.
Close the eyes to 756 feet and 572 inches merely employ the numbers
{10} 86400 seconds in 24 hours
{11} 25920 the Platonic Precession cycle {Zodiac}
{13} 5280 feet in one mile
{14} 1760 yards in one mile
{15} 660 feet in one furlong
{16} 640 acres in one square mile
{17} 6080 feet in the
{11} 46656 cubic inches in one cubic yard
{19} 43560 square feet in one acre
{20} 4840 square yards in one acre
{21} 510510 the product of 715 x 714
{22} 125606 the Sum total {added} of all the PWS numbers
{23} 1366560 the Maya “super number”
{24} 3024 the GP base perimeter {modern day feet}
{25} 2288 the GP extant top platform perimeter {modern day inches}
{26} 610.96972101 {abridged} the GP Apothem this being the square root of 373284
{27} 1836 the roofline length {sloping} of the Grand Gallery in modern day inches
{28} 1881 the floor-line length {sloping} of the Grand Gallery in modern day inches
{29} 13.846153 the approximate Solar Equatorial rotation period {36 ÷ 26}
{30} 9.729729 the approximate Solar Polar rotation period {360 ÷ 37}
I consider I have included, largely, the employed numbers within this appendix, perchance not then my apologies, however via the essays I do endeavour to elucidate the numbers utilised